Awkward identifiers

[Figures about TO gene]
Today I discovered that a gene named "to" exists. It's not difficult to imagine how much hope you have to find it in Google. That's interesting: it was mentioned on a discussion about the use of natural language identifiers in computer science modelling. But actually maybe it is a case that shows how the Semantic Web could be useful. And complement Google. Well, Google is still able to find meaning info by means of the extended name, "takeout". So, if you already know what "to" means you'll probaly look up it on a by-keyword search engine via "takeout" + something else (drosophila, gene). I wonder if marking something like "to" with something like "is the label for..." could actually improve searches. Uhm... probably relating "to or whatever" to other resources, such as publication or chromosome or who is studying this gene, to which disease or biological process is related to, etc. Uhm... Uhm... anyway I am impressed by this "to" thing...

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Written by

I'm the owner of this personal site. I'm a geek, I'm specialised in hacking software to deal with heaps of data, especially life science data. I'm interested in data standards, open culture (open source, open data, open everything), IT and society, and more. Further info at http://marcobrandizi.info/about-me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *